https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302915 The court found that the promissory notes were fully supported by consideration. The defendants failed to prove the absence of consideration, leading to a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for Rs. 11500 with interest. The court determined that the second defendant had indeed executed the promissory notes. Defendants 1 to 4 were held liable to pay the suit claim, and the validity of the execution by the first defendant was upheld. Regarding the signature of Moshin Bhai, the court found that it did not bind defendants 2 to 4, partially allowing the appeal and awarding costs to the plaintiff. en-us Wed, 21 Jun 1978 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Jun 2022 17:52:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302915 The court found that the promissory notes were fully supported by consideration. The defendants failed to prove the absence of consideration, leading to a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for Rs. 11500 with interest. The court determined that the second defendant had indeed executed the promissory notes. Defendants 1 to 4 were held liable to pay the suit claim, and the validity of the execution by the first defendant was upheld. Regarding the signature of Moshin Bhai, the court found that it did not bind defendants 2 to 4, partially allowing the appeal and awarding costs to the plaintiff. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 21 Jun 1978 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302915