https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302916 Amounts payable to a deceased employee's heirs, including provident fund, compulsory deposit, life insurance, arrears of pay and death-cum-retirement gratuity, were treated as "debts" within the scope of a succession certificate, so the certificate remained maintainable for those dues. The territorial jurisdiction objection was rejected because residence-based jurisdiction under the succession law is a mixed question of law and fact that must be specifically raised and supported by evidence, which was not done. The widowship finding in favour of respondent No. 3 was upheld because writ jurisdiction does not ordinarily disturb concurrent factual findings unless they are perverse or unsupported by evidence. en-us Thu, 01 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Jun 2022 17:52:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302916 Amounts payable to a deceased employee's heirs, including provident fund, compulsory deposit, life insurance, arrears of pay and death-cum-retirement gratuity, were treated as "debts" within the scope of a succession certificate, so the certificate remained maintainable for those dues. The territorial jurisdiction objection was rejected because residence-based jurisdiction under the succession law is a mixed question of law and fact that must be specifically raised and supported by evidence, which was not done. The widowship finding in favour of respondent No. 3 was upheld because writ jurisdiction does not ordinarily disturb concurrent factual findings unless they are perverse or unsupported by evidence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 01 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302916