https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302914 The court found that while it can rely on its own comparison of disputed signatures without expert evidence, the lower courts erred in their approach. The plaintiff's claim regarding handwriting was not substantiated due to lack of proper evidence and comparison methods. The appeal was allowed, lower court judgments set aside, and the case remanded for a fresh decision with directions for obtaining expert opinion. en-us Thu, 26 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Jun 2022 17:50:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302914 The court found that while it can rely on its own comparison of disputed signatures without expert evidence, the lower courts erred in their approach. The plaintiff's claim regarding handwriting was not substantiated due to lack of proper evidence and comparison methods. The appeal was allowed, lower court judgments set aside, and the case remanded for a fresh decision with directions for obtaining expert opinion. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 26 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302914