<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 729 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302910</link>
    <description>A cheque issued in discharge of a liability arising from an agreement to compound a non-compoundable offence is not supported by a legally enforceable debt or other liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Because the underlying agreement was connected to an offence under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and had an unlawful object, the claim founded on it was void and could not create an enforceable liability. Section 138 applies only where the cheque is drawn towards a legally enforceable debt or liability, so a cheque issued on such unlawful consideration does not attract penal liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 17:48:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682958" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 729 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302910</link>
      <description>A cheque issued in discharge of a liability arising from an agreement to compound a non-compoundable offence is not supported by a legally enforceable debt or other liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Because the underlying agreement was connected to an offence under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and had an unlawful object, the claim founded on it was void and could not create an enforceable liability. Section 138 applies only where the cheque is drawn towards a legally enforceable debt or liability, so a cheque issued on such unlawful consideration does not attract penal liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>