https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302912 The High Court overturned the appellant's conviction under sections 395 and 397 IPC for dacoity, citing that the recovery of stolen goods after a significant period did not align with the "soon after" requirement. The court reclassified the offense under section 411 IPC and imposed a fine of Rs. 3,000, with a default sentence of six months RI if the fine was not paid within three months. The appellant's time served as an undertrial was considered, and the sentence was reduced to the period already served. en-us Thu, 27 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Jun 2022 17:48:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302912 The High Court overturned the appellant's conviction under sections 395 and 397 IPC for dacoity, citing that the recovery of stolen goods after a significant period did not align with the "soon after" requirement. The court reclassified the offense under section 411 IPC and imposed a fine of Rs. 3,000, with a default sentence of six months RI if the fine was not paid within three months. The appellant's time served as an undertrial was considered, and the sentence was reduced to the period already served. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 27 Feb 1997 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302912