https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302908 The SC dismissed the civil appeal, affirming the trial court's and HC's findings that the plaintiff owned the suit plot and that the certified copies of the sale and gift deeds were admissible under the presumption in Section 90 Evidence Act. The Court held that objections to mode of proof must be raised before a document is marked and cannot be raised belatedly; because the appellant failed to object at trial, the secondary evidence was properly admitted and the decree in favor of the respondent was upheld. en-us Wed, 04 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 Aug 2025 11:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302908 The SC dismissed the civil appeal, affirming the trial court's and HC's findings that the plaintiff owned the suit plot and that the certified copies of the sale and gift deeds were admissible under the presumption in Section 90 Evidence Act. The Court held that objections to mode of proof must be raised before a document is marked and cannot be raised belatedly; because the appellant failed to object at trial, the secondary evidence was properly admitted and the decree in favor of the respondent was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 Aug 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302908