<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Taxpayer&#039;s Unexplained Deposits u/s 68 Deemed Valid; CIT(A) Deletes Addition Due to Lack of Lender Testimony.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64230</link>
    <description>Addition u/s 68 - unexplained deposits in bank account - The assessing officer has made the addition simply because the assessee failed to produce the lender. Merely because the assessee failed to produce the lender, cannot be the ground for disbelieving the transaction. The Ld.CIT(A), on the aforesaid facts, discussed, has rightly deleted the addition - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 15:16:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 15:16:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Taxpayer&#039;s Unexplained Deposits u/s 68 Deemed Valid; CIT(A) Deletes Addition Due to Lack of Lender Testimony.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64230</link>
      <description>Addition u/s 68 - unexplained deposits in bank account - The assessing officer has made the addition simply because the assessee failed to produce the lender. Merely because the assessee failed to produce the lender, cannot be the ground for disbelieving the transaction. The Ld.CIT(A), on the aforesaid facts, discussed, has rightly deleted the addition - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 15:16:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>