<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 766 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302903</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed with the findings upheld on rebate and trade discount expenses, but set aside on freight and cartage expenses. The Tribunal found the disallowance of freight and cartage expenses under Section 40(a)(ia) unwarranted as it involved reimbursement of expenses. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision was set aside, and the assessee succeeded on this ground. The judgment was pronounced on 17th October 2011 by ITAT Chandigarh.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 15:13:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 766 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302903</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed with the findings upheld on rebate and trade discount expenses, but set aside on freight and cartage expenses. The Tribunal found the disallowance of freight and cartage expenses under Section 40(a)(ia) unwarranted as it involved reimbursement of expenses. The CIT(A)&#039;s decision was set aside, and the assessee succeeded on this ground. The judgment was pronounced on 17th October 2011 by ITAT Chandigarh.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>