https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302893 Insertion of additional marginal witnesses in an agreement of sale was held not to be a material alteration because it did not change the instrument's legal effect, rights, or liabilities, and did not affect enforceability. The Court also stated that concurrent findings in second appeal may be disturbed only on a substantial question of law; where the lower courts had accepted the agreement and decreed specific performance, interference without a genuine legal error was unjustified. The challenge based on alleged interpolation therefore failed, and the decrees for specific performance were restored. en-us Tue, 16 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 19 Feb 2025 16:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302893 Insertion of additional marginal witnesses in an agreement of sale was held not to be a material alteration because it did not change the instrument's legal effect, rights, or liabilities, and did not affect enforceability. The Court also stated that concurrent findings in second appeal may be disturbed only on a substantial question of law; where the lower courts had accepted the agreement and decreed specific performance, interference without a genuine legal error was unjustified. The challenge based on alleged interpolation therefore failed, and the decrees for specific performance were restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302893