<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 771 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302888</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, a firm of Chartered Accountants, in an appeal against the CIT(A)&#039;s order for A.Y. 2007-08. The Tribunal deleted the additions to income made by the AO, stating that the credit balances in the balance sheet were non-reimbursed expenses by clients and not reflective of income. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding the disallowance of expenses, finding no justification for the disallowances made by the lower authorities, including car expenses essential for business purposes. The issues related to interest under sections 234B, 234C, 234D, and withdrawal under section 244A were not the primary focus of the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 10:06:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682919" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 771 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302888</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, a firm of Chartered Accountants, in an appeal against the CIT(A)&#039;s order for A.Y. 2007-08. The Tribunal deleted the additions to income made by the AO, stating that the credit balances in the balance sheet were non-reimbursed expenses by clients and not reflective of income. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding the disallowance of expenses, finding no justification for the disallowances made by the lower authorities, including car expenses essential for business purposes. The issues related to interest under sections 234B, 234C, 234D, and withdrawal under section 244A were not the primary focus of the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302888</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>