<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Penalty u/r 26 Invalid Without Goods Confiscation Order, Cannot Be Applied to Appellant or Managing Director.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64223</link>
    <description>Levy of penalty - the penalty under Section 26 is inextricably linked to the confiscation of goods as long as there is no confiscation of the goods ordered that there cannot be a case for imposition of penalty under Rule 26. Therefore, it is found that the penalty under Rule 26 cannot be sustained either on the appellant or on the Managing Director of the appellant company. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 09:52:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 09:52:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Penalty u/r 26 Invalid Without Goods Confiscation Order, Cannot Be Applied to Appellant or Managing Director.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64223</link>
      <description>Levy of penalty - the penalty under Section 26 is inextricably linked to the confiscation of goods as long as there is no confiscation of the goods ordered that there cannot be a case for imposition of penalty under Rule 26. Therefore, it is found that the penalty under Rule 26 cannot be sustained either on the appellant or on the Managing Director of the appellant company. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 09:52:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>