<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1022 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424181</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to compute income from house property based on annual value. It ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the exemption under section 54EC of the Income Tax Act for investments made after the transfer of shares, citing ambiguity in legislative language and following the principle benefiting the assessee. The ITAT overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and ordered the deletion of the addition based on this ground.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 09:24:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1022 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424181</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to compute income from house property based on annual value. It ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the exemption under section 54EC of the Income Tax Act for investments made after the transfer of shares, citing ambiguity in legislative language and following the principle benefiting the assessee. The ITAT overturned the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and ordered the deletion of the addition based on this ground.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>