<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (4) TMI 50 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29292</link>
    <description>Penalty for concealment was held unsustainable where the Tribunal found that, although the addition to income was justified on the evidence, the material did not establish deliberate concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. The High Court found no perversity in that appreciation of evidence and no lack of supporting material, so the finding that concealment was not proved was upheld and penalty was not leviable under the 1922 Income-tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:25:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (4) TMI 50 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29292</link>
      <description>Penalty for concealment was held unsustainable where the Tribunal found that, although the addition to income was justified on the evidence, the material did not establish deliberate concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. The High Court found no perversity in that appreciation of evidence and no lack of supporting material, so the finding that concealment was not proved was upheld and penalty was not leviable under the 1922 Income-tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>