https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424153 A compromise award of a Daily Lok Adalat was treated as a compromise decree, and a belated writ challenge was found barred by delay, laches and acquiescence because the petitioner had prior knowledge of the underlying civil dispute and related transactions; the court therefore did not interfere with the award and left any other remedy open in law. In parallel, the court held that an interested party in change of land use proceedings is entitled to a fair hearing, and that advancing the hearing on short notice was unjustified; to secure unbiased consideration, it directed that the matter be placed before another competent authority or dealt with by the departmental authority itself. en-us Tue, 19 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Jun 2022 09:23:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424153 A compromise award of a Daily Lok Adalat was treated as a compromise decree, and a belated writ challenge was found barred by delay, laches and acquiescence because the petitioner had prior knowledge of the underlying civil dispute and related transactions; the court therefore did not interfere with the award and left any other remedy open in law. In parallel, the court held that an interested party in change of land use proceedings is entitled to a fair hearing, and that advancing the hearing on short notice was unjustified; to secure unbiased consideration, it directed that the matter be placed before another competent authority or dealt with by the departmental authority itself. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 19 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424153