<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 984 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOLKATA BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424143</link>
    <description>An application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was found maintainable because the operational creditor established an operational debt and default, while the corporate debtor&#039;s allegations of non-receipt of goods, sub-standard quality, collusion, and notice defects were not supported by material evidence. The correspondence, including cheques and a letter indicating willingness to pay through RTGS, showed an admitted business relationship and acknowledgment of liability. On that basis, the pre-existing dispute objection failed, the petition was held complete, and CIRP was directed to commence with moratorium and appointment of the Interim Resolution Professional.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2022 18:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 984 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , KOLKATA BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424143</link>
      <description>An application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was found maintainable because the operational creditor established an operational debt and default, while the corporate debtor&#039;s allegations of non-receipt of goods, sub-standard quality, collusion, and notice defects were not supported by material evidence. The correspondence, including cheques and a letter indicating willingness to pay through RTGS, showed an admitted business relationship and acknowledgment of liability. On that basis, the pre-existing dispute objection failed, the petition was held complete, and CIRP was directed to commence with moratorium and appointment of the Interim Resolution Professional.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>