https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424138 The Appeal was dismissed as infructuous by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA. The matter had been remanded back to the original authority, and upon examination, it was found that the refund claim was inadmissible due to the unjust enrichment clause. The Appeal was deemed unnecessary as the issue of remand had been resolved, leading to its dismissal. The Tribunal also addressed the request for expeditious decision-making but clarified they could not direct on an issue not before them, leaving the parties to pursue the matter further if desired. en-us Wed, 15 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Jun 2022 09:22:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424138 The Appeal was dismissed as infructuous by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA. The matter had been remanded back to the original authority, and upon examination, it was found that the refund claim was inadmissible due to the unjust enrichment clause. The Appeal was deemed unnecessary as the issue of remand had been resolved, leading to its dismissal. The Tribunal also addressed the request for expeditious decision-making but clarified they could not direct on an issue not before them, leaving the parties to pursue the matter further if desired. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 15 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424138