https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302872 Premises earmarked for residential use under a Master Plan could not lawfully be used for banking, nursing home or other commercial activity, because residential use was limited to habitation and incidental uses and the lease and deed conditions reinforced that restriction. The Development Authority had no power to permit mixed use or change of user by executive decision, administrative convenience or notice; any alteration required compliance with the prescribed statutory procedure and valid amendment of the plan or regulations. Notices and cancellation orders stopping misuse were therefore justified, subject to limited relief allowing doctors, lawyers and architects to use part of the ground floor for clinics or offices on lawful terms. en-us Mon, 05 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Jun 2022 12:58:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302872 Premises earmarked for residential use under a Master Plan could not lawfully be used for banking, nursing home or other commercial activity, because residential use was limited to habitation and incidental uses and the lease and deed conditions reinforced that restriction. The Development Authority had no power to permit mixed use or change of user by executive decision, administrative convenience or notice; any alteration required compliance with the prescribed statutory procedure and valid amendment of the plan or regulations. Notices and cancellation orders stopping misuse were therefore justified, subject to limited relief allowing doctors, lawyers and architects to use part of the ground floor for clinics or offices on lawful terms. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302872