<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 960 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424119</link>
    <description>The Court quashed the notice seeking to reopen the assessment for A.Y. 2014-15 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It held that the reassessment was not justified as it appeared to be based on a change of opinion rather than the escapement of income due to undisclosed material facts. The Court found that the reassessment lacked new tangible material and was impermissible, ultimately ruling in favor of the Petitioner and disposing of the case with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 May 2023 16:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 960 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424119</link>
      <description>The Court quashed the notice seeking to reopen the assessment for A.Y. 2014-15 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It held that the reassessment was not justified as it appeared to be based on a change of opinion rather than the escapement of income due to undisclosed material facts. The Court found that the reassessment lacked new tangible material and was impermissible, ultimately ruling in favor of the Petitioner and disposing of the case with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>