<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 953 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424112</link>
    <description>Interest on suppliers&#039; credit remained taxable at the concessional gross rate under Article 11(2) of the India-Japan DTAA because Article 11(6) did not apply. The decisive test is whether the relevant debt-claim is effectively connected with a permanent establishment so that the interest is attributable to that establishment and falls under Article 7; the mere existence of a permanent establishment, or a general business nexus, is not enough. On the facts, there was no material showing that the debt-claim formed part of the permanent establishment&#039;s assets, that economic ownership was allocated to it, or that the establishment played a critical role in earning the interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 10:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682785" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 953 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424112</link>
      <description>Interest on suppliers&#039; credit remained taxable at the concessional gross rate under Article 11(2) of the India-Japan DTAA because Article 11(6) did not apply. The decisive test is whether the relevant debt-claim is effectively connected with a permanent establishment so that the interest is attributable to that establishment and falls under Article 7; the mere existence of a permanent establishment, or a general business nexus, is not enough. On the facts, there was no material showing that the debt-claim formed part of the permanent establishment&#039;s assets, that economic ownership was allocated to it, or that the establishment played a critical role in earning the interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>