<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 941 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424100</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the reassessment under section 147 for the Assessment Year 2011-12, adding Rs.20,00,000 as unexplained cash credits due to the appellant&#039;s failure to prove the sources of cash deposits. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of substantiating the origins of the funds and addressed the procedural issue of delayed reasons for reopening the case, providing guidance for future proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2022 09:14:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 941 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424100</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the reassessment under section 147 for the Assessment Year 2011-12, adding Rs.20,00,000 as unexplained cash credits due to the appellant&#039;s failure to prove the sources of cash deposits. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of substantiating the origins of the funds and addressed the procedural issue of delayed reasons for reopening the case, providing guidance for future proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>