https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424084 Limitation under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was examined by reference to the dates of the impugned order, its upload, and filing of the appeal, and the appeal was treated as timely. On moratorium under Section 14, the Tribunal held that in a real estate CIRP, where allottees were already in possession and only execution and registration of sale deeds remained, that step was procedural and did not amount to an impermissible transfer of corporate debtor assets. The Tribunal also stressed protection of homebuyers and directed completion of conveyance after payment of any outstanding dues and charges. en-us Fri, 17 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Jun 2022 08:17:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424084 Limitation under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was examined by reference to the dates of the impugned order, its upload, and filing of the appeal, and the appeal was treated as timely. On moratorium under Section 14, the Tribunal held that in a real estate CIRP, where allottees were already in possession and only execution and registration of sale deeds remained, that step was procedural and did not amount to an impermissible transfer of corporate debtor assets. The Tribunal also stressed protection of homebuyers and directed completion of conveyance after payment of any outstanding dues and charges. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Fri, 17 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424084