<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (1) TMI 28 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29277</link>
    <description>Tribunal appellate jurisdiction extends to a fresh plea raised by a respondent to support the decision under challenge, provided it remains within statutory limits; the Tribunal may determine the matter on that basis, remit it, or examine the necessary facts. A body of individuals is distinct from an association of persons and requires a plurality of individuals with a collective nexus to an income source, rather than common intention or active combination. Continuation of an inherited business as an economic unit, without severance or separate enjoyment, supports assessment of a widow and her sons as a body of individuals. The questions were answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:26:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (1) TMI 28 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29277</link>
      <description>Tribunal appellate jurisdiction extends to a fresh plea raised by a respondent to support the decision under challenge, provided it remains within statutory limits; the Tribunal may determine the matter on that basis, remit it, or examine the necessary facts. A body of individuals is distinct from an association of persons and requires a plurality of individuals with a collective nexus to an income source, rather than common intention or active combination. Continuation of an inherited business as an economic unit, without severance or separate enjoyment, supports assessment of a widow and her sons as a body of individuals. The questions were answered in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>