<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 914 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424073</link>
    <description>Service tax liability under reverse charge arose only if the transporter qualified as a Goods Transport Agency and issued a consignment note. As the transporters had not issued consignment notes, the movement of sugarcane was treated as simple transport rather than GTA service, so the sugar mill could not be fastened with tax as the recipient. The service tax demand was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2022 07:52:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 914 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424073</link>
      <description>Service tax liability under reverse charge arose only if the transporter qualified as a Goods Transport Agency and issued a consignment note. As the transporters had not issued consignment notes, the movement of sugarcane was treated as simple transport rather than GTA service, so the sugar mill could not be fastened with tax as the recipient. The service tax demand was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424073</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>