<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 909 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424068</link>
    <description>The court held that the first and second Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the Plaintiff Rs.1,06,33,863/- with 9% interest per annum from 07.11.2017 till realization and Rs.3,00,000/- as costs. The judgment found the second Defendant liable under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1882, as a principal debtor or surety, despite the absence of explicit acceptance on the bill of exchange. The Defendants&#039; failure to honor the bill resulted in the Plaintiff suffering financial losses, leading to the court&#039;s ruling in favor of the Plaintiff.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2022 20:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 909 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424068</link>
      <description>The court held that the first and second Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the Plaintiff Rs.1,06,33,863/- with 9% interest per annum from 07.11.2017 till realization and Rs.3,00,000/- as costs. The judgment found the second Defendant liable under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1882, as a principal debtor or surety, despite the absence of explicit acceptance on the bill of exchange. The Defendants&#039; failure to honor the bill resulted in the Plaintiff suffering financial losses, leading to the court&#039;s ruling in favor of the Plaintiff.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>