<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (4) TMI 1424 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302853</link>
    <description>Before the 1 June 2015 amendment, section 200A did not authorise adjustment of late filing fee under section 234E while processing a TDS statement, so an intimation including that fee exceeded the permissible scope of processing. The Tribunal followed its earlier view and deleted the levy, allowing the appeal in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2022 20:38:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (4) TMI 1424 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302853</link>
      <description>Before the 1 June 2015 amendment, section 200A did not authorise adjustment of late filing fee under section 234E while processing a TDS statement, so an intimation including that fee exceeded the permissible scope of processing. The Tribunal followed its earlier view and deleted the levy, allowing the appeal in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>