<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (7) TMI 1357 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302851</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petitions under sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013, as the petitioners did not qualify as members and failed to assert their beneficial ownership rights properly. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper recognition and filing of beneficial ownership, the distinct legal identities of holding and subsidiary companies, and the need for timely legal action to assert rights and seek remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2022 20:38:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (7) TMI 1357 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302851</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petitions under sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013, as the petitioners did not qualify as members and failed to assert their beneficial ownership rights properly. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper recognition and filing of beneficial ownership, the distinct legal identities of holding and subsidiary companies, and the need for timely legal action to assert rights and seek remedies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>