https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302861 A foreign arbitral award made while an interim anti-arbitration injunction was in force was held not to be unenforceable once that injunction was later vacated. The court treated such an injunction as an exceptional equitable remedy, and the later final vacation of the injunction was taken to relate back, extinguishing the only objection founded on its subsistence. Separate objections under Section 48 were not properly established before the court of first instance and could not be newly expanded at the enforcement stage. Enforcement refusal was therefore set aside and the award was allowed to proceed toward enforcement. en-us Wed, 13 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Jun 2022 20:38:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302861 A foreign arbitral award made while an interim anti-arbitration injunction was in force was held not to be unenforceable once that injunction was later vacated. The court treated such an injunction as an exceptional equitable remedy, and the later final vacation of the injunction was taken to relate back, extinguishing the only objection founded on its subsistence. Separate objections under Section 48 were not properly established before the court of first instance and could not be newly expanded at the enforcement stage. Enforcement refusal was therefore set aside and the award was allowed to proceed toward enforcement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 13 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302861