https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302859 In a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act prosecution, the note explains that a returned complaint was not shown to be refiled beyond the protected period, so the limitation objection failed. It also states that, at the cognizance stage, affidavit evidence with the cheque, return memo, notice and postal documents is sufficient for summoning, so the challenge to the summoning order was rejected. On service, notice sent by registered post to the correct address attracted the statutory presumption of service, and the accused did not rebut it; the objection was therefore rejected and the complaint proceedings were allowed to continue. en-us Thu, 25 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Jun 2022 20:38:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302859 In a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act prosecution, the note explains that a returned complaint was not shown to be refiled beyond the protected period, so the limitation objection failed. It also states that, at the cognizance stage, affidavit evidence with the cheque, return memo, notice and postal documents is sufficient for summoning, so the challenge to the summoning order was rejected. On service, notice sent by registered post to the correct address attracted the statutory presumption of service, and the accused did not rebut it; the objection was therefore rejected and the complaint proceedings were allowed to continue. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 25 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302859