<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 1322 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302865</link>
    <description>Party autonomy in arbitration was upheld where the contract incorporated FOSFA Rules, English law and England as the juridical seat. An anti-arbitration injunction should be granted only in exceptional circumstances, so it could not be continued once the agreed arbitral forum was clear. Objections that the arbitration agreement was null and void, inoperative, or incapable of performance were not supported by sufficient prima facie material, and issues such as non-supply of the form, unconscionability, neutrality and arbitrator bias were treated as matters for the arbitral tribunal or the courts of the seat. The dispute was left to the agreed arbitral framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2022 20:38:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 1322 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302865</link>
      <description>Party autonomy in arbitration was upheld where the contract incorporated FOSFA Rules, English law and England as the juridical seat. An anti-arbitration injunction should be granted only in exceptional circumstances, so it could not be continued once the agreed arbitral forum was clear. Objections that the arbitration agreement was null and void, inoperative, or incapable of performance were not supported by sufficient prima facie material, and issues such as non-supply of the form, unconscionability, neutrality and arbitrator bias were treated as matters for the arbitral tribunal or the courts of the seat. The dispute was left to the agreed arbitral framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302865</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>