<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (1) TMI 16 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29274</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Income-tax Officer&#039;s order on interest did not merge with appellate orders, allowing the Commissioner to revise the assessment under section 263. The court emphasized the non-universal application of the merger doctrine, citing relevant precedents. The decision favored the Revenue, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s jurisdiction to revise the assessment not contested in the appeal. Each party was responsible for its costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:19:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (1) TMI 16 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29274</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Income-tax Officer&#039;s order on interest did not merge with appellate orders, allowing the Commissioner to revise the assessment under section 263. The court emphasized the non-universal application of the merger doctrine, citing relevant precedents. The decision favored the Revenue, affirming the Commissioner&#039;s jurisdiction to revise the assessment not contested in the appeal. Each party was responsible for its costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>