<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1629 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302868</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the legality and constitutionality of the notification repealing the 1999 Scheme. It found that the State Government&#039;s decision to repeal the scheme was based on legitimate financial considerations, employees did not have a vested right to claim pension benefits under the 1999 Scheme, and the repeal did not violate constitutional rights. The Court allowed the appeals, set aside the High Court&#039;s order, and concluded that the State Government&#039;s actions were reasonable and justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2022 20:38:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1629 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302868</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the legality and constitutionality of the notification repealing the 1999 Scheme. It found that the State Government&#039;s decision to repeal the scheme was based on legitimate financial considerations, employees did not have a vested right to claim pension benefits under the 1999 Scheme, and the repeal did not violate constitutional rights. The Court allowed the appeals, set aside the High Court&#039;s order, and concluded that the State Government&#039;s actions were reasonable and justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>