<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (3) TMI 39 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29273</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras ruled in favor of East India Industries (Madras) Private Limited in an income tax assessment case for the year 1970-71. The court held that urban land tax paid during the relevant year should be deductible in computing income from property, regardless of the year it related to. The court also upheld the assessee&#039;s entitlement to a higher development rebate under section 80-I of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for manufacturing waterproof paper, aligning with the relevant schedule entries. However, the court deferred a decision on creating a development rebate reserve, directing the Tribunal to reexamine the matter comprehensively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:16:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (3) TMI 39 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29273</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras ruled in favor of East India Industries (Madras) Private Limited in an income tax assessment case for the year 1970-71. The court held that urban land tax paid during the relevant year should be deductible in computing income from property, regardless of the year it related to. The court also upheld the assessee&#039;s entitlement to a higher development rebate under section 80-I of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for manufacturing waterproof paper, aligning with the relevant schedule entries. However, the court deferred a decision on creating a development rebate reserve, directing the Tribunal to reexamine the matter comprehensively.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29273</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>