<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 1131 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302848</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decision of the Single Judge to deny the application for an anti-suit injunction. It was held that the agreement to be governed by Illinois law excluded the jurisdiction of Indian courts. The Plaintiff failed to meet the necessary conditions for granting the injunction, as the court emphasized the principle of comity and the rarity of such injunctions. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2022 14:55:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 1131 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302848</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decision of the Single Judge to deny the application for an anti-suit injunction. It was held that the agreement to be governed by Illinois law excluded the jurisdiction of Indian courts. The Plaintiff failed to meet the necessary conditions for granting the injunction, as the court emphasized the principle of comity and the rarity of such injunctions. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>