https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424064 The Court allowed the writ petition, quashing the notice and order challenging the reopening of the assessment. The Court found the reasons provided for reopening lacked specificity and failed to address crucial information, leading to a flawed factual basis for the notice and order. The Petitioner's argument regarding the oversight of relevant details in Note 15 was upheld, resulting in the Court ruling in favor of the Petitioner without imposing any costs. en-us Mon, 13 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Jan 2023 17:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424064 The Court allowed the writ petition, quashing the notice and order challenging the reopening of the assessment. The Court found the reasons provided for reopening lacked specificity and failed to address crucial information, leading to a flawed factual basis for the notice and order. The Petitioner's argument regarding the oversight of relevant details in Note 15 was upheld, resulting in the Court ruling in favor of the Petitioner without imposing any costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 13 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424064