<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 887 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424046</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; decisions disallowing 20% of salaries as project costs and rejecting revenue recognition under the percentage completion method. The Tribunal found the lower authorities lacked proper reasoning and application of mind, deeming the actions unsustainable. Consequently, the disallowance/addition made by the Assessing Officer was deleted, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2022 08:56:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 887 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424046</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; decisions disallowing 20% of salaries as project costs and rejecting revenue recognition under the percentage completion method. The Tribunal found the lower authorities lacked proper reasoning and application of mind, deeming the actions unsustainable. Consequently, the disallowance/addition made by the Assessing Officer was deleted, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424046</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>