<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 886 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424045</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, deleting additions made under Section 69A and Section 69C while upholding the legality of the assessment reopening under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found the reassessment justified based on unexplained cash deposits but concluded that the additions under Sections 69A and 69C were unwarranted due to insufficient consideration of explanations and evidence provided by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2022 11:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 886 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424045</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, deleting additions made under Section 69A and Section 69C while upholding the legality of the assessment reopening under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found the reassessment justified based on unexplained cash deposits but concluded that the additions under Sections 69A and 69C were unwarranted due to insufficient consideration of explanations and evidence provided by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>