<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 864 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424023</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the Writ Petition due to the Petitioner&#039;s delay, lack of compliance with SVLDR Scheme procedures, concealment of relevant facts, and absence of a justifiable cause for relief after the closure of the Scheme. The judgment underscores the importance of timely and transparent approaches to legal remedies, emphasizing the need for petitioners to adhere to procedural requirements and demonstrate diligence in seeking redress.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2022 08:55:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 864 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424023</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the Writ Petition due to the Petitioner&#039;s delay, lack of compliance with SVLDR Scheme procedures, concealment of relevant facts, and absence of a justifiable cause for relief after the closure of the Scheme. The judgment underscores the importance of timely and transparent approaches to legal remedies, emphasizing the need for petitioners to adhere to procedural requirements and demonstrate diligence in seeking redress.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>