<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (7) TMI 19 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29266</link>
    <description>The court concluded that no sub-partnership existed between the assessee and his wife. However, it affirmed that section 64(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, would apply to a sub-partnership if it existed. The judgment governed I.T.R. Nos. 764 of 1975 and 511 of 1977, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:23:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (7) TMI 19 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29266</link>
      <description>The court concluded that no sub-partnership existed between the assessee and his wife. However, it affirmed that section 64(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, would apply to a sub-partnership if it existed. The judgment governed I.T.R. Nos. 764 of 1975 and 511 of 1977, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>