<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 858 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424017</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving a dispute over a refund claim for input service and denial of Cenvat Credit. The appellant&#039;s appeal against the rejection of the refund claim was dismissed by the Commissioner (Appeals), leading to the appeal before the Tribunal. The Tribunal found that the appellant was within their rights to avail the Cenvat Credit, as the refund claim had been rejected. The Tribunal also held that the allegation of time limitation on the Cenvat Credit was not raised in the show cause notice and therefore not applicable, ultimately allowing the appeal and setting aside the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2022 08:54:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 858 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424017</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving a dispute over a refund claim for input service and denial of Cenvat Credit. The appellant&#039;s appeal against the rejection of the refund claim was dismissed by the Commissioner (Appeals), leading to the appeal before the Tribunal. The Tribunal found that the appellant was within their rights to avail the Cenvat Credit, as the refund claim had been rejected. The Tribunal also held that the allegation of time limitation on the Cenvat Credit was not raised in the show cause notice and therefore not applicable, ultimately allowing the appeal and setting aside the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>