https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424013 The court allowed the petition seeking the quashing of FIR No. 880 under Section 174-A of the IPC and all subsequent proceedings. It emphasized the importance of considering compromises in main complaints and held that continuing proceedings after withdrawal of the main complaint would amount to an abuse of the legal process. The court highlighted that declaring a person as a proclaimed offender in connection with the FIR becomes insignificant if the main complaint leading to the proclamation is withdrawn due to compromise. en-us Thu, 02 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Jun 2022 18:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424013 The court allowed the petition seeking the quashing of FIR No. 880 under Section 174-A of the IPC and all subsequent proceedings. It emphasized the importance of considering compromises in main complaints and held that continuing proceedings after withdrawal of the main complaint would amount to an abuse of the legal process. The court highlighted that declaring a person as a proclaimed offender in connection with the FIR becomes insignificant if the main complaint leading to the proclamation is withdrawn due to compromise. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424013