<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 853 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424012</link>
    <description>The court decreed in favor of the Plaintiff in a case involving the recovery of money based on a promissory note executed by the Defendant. The Defendant&#039;s denial of executing the note was rebutted by the court&#039;s finding that the disputed signature matched admitted signatures, upholding the presumption of consideration under Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Plaintiff was awarded Rs.1,71,20,256/- with interest and costs totaling Rs.3,00,000/-, based on prevailing interest rates and the &quot;loser pays&quot; principle.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2022 08:54:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 853 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424012</link>
      <description>The court decreed in favor of the Plaintiff in a case involving the recovery of money based on a promissory note executed by the Defendant. The Defendant&#039;s denial of executing the note was rebutted by the court&#039;s finding that the disputed signature matched admitted signatures, upholding the presumption of consideration under Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Plaintiff was awarded Rs.1,71,20,256/- with interest and costs totaling Rs.3,00,000/-, based on prevailing interest rates and the &quot;loser pays&quot; principle.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>