https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302836 The Court quashed the complaint proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, finding that the complainant failed to establish effective service of notice within the required timeframe. Despite arguments from the State that there was virtual compliance with the notice requirement, the Court emphasized the necessity of fulfilling mandatory legal requirements. The Court allowed the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., granting the opposite party liberty to proceed in accordance with the law. The judgment underscores the importance of adhering to the prescribed notice period and legal pre-conditions in such cases. en-us Fri, 31 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Jun 2022 21:16:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302836 The Court quashed the complaint proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, finding that the complainant failed to establish effective service of notice within the required timeframe. Despite arguments from the State that there was virtual compliance with the notice requirement, the Court emphasized the necessity of fulfilling mandatory legal requirements. The Court allowed the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., granting the opposite party liberty to proceed in accordance with the law. The judgment underscores the importance of adhering to the prescribed notice period and legal pre-conditions in such cases. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 31 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302836