https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302835 The court quashed the proceedings initiated under Section 182(3) of the Companies Act, 2013, as the petitioners had complied with the amended disclosure requirements, and the omission of disclosing the political party's name was deemed an inadvertent error. The court found no evidence of intent or mens rea to suppress information, concluding that the initiation of proceedings was unjustified. Consequently, the court allowed the petition, quashing the proceedings in C.C. No.134/2019, stating it would serve the interests of justice. en-us Fri, 24 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Jun 2022 21:16:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302835 The court quashed the proceedings initiated under Section 182(3) of the Companies Act, 2013, as the petitioners had complied with the amended disclosure requirements, and the omission of disclosing the political party's name was deemed an inadvertent error. The court found no evidence of intent or mens rea to suppress information, concluding that the initiation of proceedings was unjustified. Consequently, the court allowed the petition, quashing the proceedings in C.C. No.134/2019, stating it would serve the interests of justice. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 24 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302835