<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1582 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302834</link>
    <description>The Court granted the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and quashed the proceedings due to non-compliance with the requirement of effective service of notice within the specified time period of 15 days under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to legal provisions and cited previous judgments to support its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2022 21:16:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1582 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302834</link>
      <description>The Court granted the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and quashed the proceedings due to non-compliance with the requirement of effective service of notice within the specified time period of 15 days under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. The Court emphasized the importance of adhering to legal provisions and cited previous judgments to support its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>