<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (3) TMI 1407 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302831</link>
    <description>Where the balance appeal fee had been paid and proof of compliance was already on record, the Tribunal held that the defect pointed out by the registry stood cured and the earlier dismissal for short payment could not survive. The Revenue accepted the factual position, and the Tribunal recalled the dismissal order, directing the appeal to be fixed for hearing. The miscellaneous petition was therefore allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2022 21:16:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (3) TMI 1407 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302831</link>
      <description>Where the balance appeal fee had been paid and proof of compliance was already on record, the Tribunal held that the defect pointed out by the registry stood cured and the earlier dismissal for short payment could not survive. The Revenue accepted the factual position, and the Tribunal recalled the dismissal order, directing the appeal to be fixed for hearing. The miscellaneous petition was therefore allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>