<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (10) TMI 119 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302827</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, set aside the High Court&#039;s order, and restored the Chief Presidency Magistrate&#039;s order discharging the appellants. The Court emphasized that the prosecution was groundless due to the lack of mens rea and the retrospective effect of the Deviation Order, thereby preventing unnecessary harassment of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2022 15:15:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (10) TMI 119 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302827</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, set aside the High Court&#039;s order, and restored the Chief Presidency Magistrate&#039;s order discharging the appellants. The Court emphasized that the prosecution was groundless due to the lack of mens rea and the retrospective effect of the Deviation Order, thereby preventing unnecessary harassment of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302827</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>