https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302826 Rule 31 of Chapter 4(F) of the High Court Rules and Orders read with Clause 26 of the Letters Patent applies only when judges of a Bench are actually divided on a point of decision. The connected orders showed no real difference: on maintainability, both judges held the writ petition maintainable as a public interest litigation, despite different reasoning; on final directions, both proceeded on cancellation of the earlier allotment and required a fresh, lawful and transparent process consistent with constitutional requirements. Mere variation in wording or emphasis did not create a referable divergence. The miscellaneous applications were therefore liable to be dismissed. en-us Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Jun 2022 12:56:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302826 Rule 31 of Chapter 4(F) of the High Court Rules and Orders read with Clause 26 of the Letters Patent applies only when judges of a Bench are actually divided on a point of decision. The connected orders showed no real difference: on maintainability, both judges held the writ petition maintainable as a public interest litigation, despite different reasoning; on final directions, both proceeded on cancellation of the earlier allotment and required a fresh, lawful and transparent process consistent with constitutional requirements. Mere variation in wording or emphasis did not create a referable divergence. The miscellaneous applications were therefore liable to be dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302826