https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302824 The judgment clarified that a third judge, appointed due to a disagreement between two judges of a Division Bench, can only provide an opinion on the specific point of difference and not decide the entire case. After the third judge's opinion, the case must return to the Division Bench for a final decision following the majority opinion, including the third judge's view. Any decision by the third judge beyond the specified point is invalid and must be disregarded. The Chief Justice can establish a new Division Bench if the original one is unavailable to ensure compliance with the prescribed procedure. en-us Sat, 07 May 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Jun 2022 12:16:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302824 The judgment clarified that a third judge, appointed due to a disagreement between two judges of a Division Bench, can only provide an opinion on the specific point of difference and not decide the entire case. After the third judge's opinion, the case must return to the Division Bench for a final decision following the majority opinion, including the third judge's view. Any decision by the third judge beyond the specified point is invalid and must be disregarded. The Chief Justice can establish a new Division Bench if the original one is unavailable to ensure compliance with the prescribed procedure. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 07 May 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302824