<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (9) TMI 429 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302823</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the validity of appointments of certain Assistants in the Intelligence Bureau and the assignment of seniority to the petitioners. The Court emphasized the importance of timely challenges to seniority lists to maintain stability in government service. The Court upheld the preliminary objection of laches, highlighting the need for government servants to promptly address issues to avoid administrative complications. The Court directed a review of promotions in the Intelligence Bureau according to the seniority list from January 28, 1976, and made no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2022 12:00:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=682571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (9) TMI 429 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302823</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the validity of appointments of certain Assistants in the Intelligence Bureau and the assignment of seniority to the petitioners. The Court emphasized the importance of timely challenges to seniority lists to maintain stability in government service. The Court upheld the preliminary objection of laches, highlighting the need for government servants to promptly address issues to avoid administrative complications. The Court directed a review of promotions in the Intelligence Bureau according to the seniority list from January 28, 1976, and made no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>