https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424008 The HC allowed an application seeking refund of IGST paid under Entry No.10 of Notification No.10/2017-IGST (Rate), which had been declared ultra vires the IGST Act, 2017 by a Division Bench. Relying on the SC's dismissal of Civil Appeal No.1390 of 2022 that upheld the Division Bench's judgment, the Court directed respondents to refund the IGST amount already paid by the applicants with statutory interest within four weeks of document submission. The rule was made absolute in favor of the applicants. en-us Wed, 08 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Apr 2025 16:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424008 The HC allowed an application seeking refund of IGST paid under Entry No.10 of Notification No.10/2017-IGST (Rate), which had been declared ultra vires the IGST Act, 2017 by a Division Bench. Relying on the SC's dismissal of Civil Appeal No.1390 of 2022 that upheld the Division Bench's judgment, the Court directed respondents to refund the IGST amount already paid by the applicants with statutory interest within four weeks of document submission. The rule was made absolute in favor of the applicants. Case-Laws GST Wed, 08 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=424008